Moving along nicely...

• Chris Liscio


This evening I was glad to finally see MLS order selection implemented in my software. Since I rewrote the MLS subsystem recently, I am now able to support arbitrary MLS lengths for measurements. Originally, I wondered if this fact made any sort of difference, and after some testing I have certainly shown that it does.</p><p>When using smaller MLS measurement sequences, there is certainly a lot more noise caused by room effects (reflection, absorption, etc). By increasing the MLS size, you are effectively averaging far more impulse response measurements to gather the "true" response of the system under test. I know this is the core of the MLS theory, but to see it in action is neat. You really do get a feel for the ability of an MLS measurement to make the results appear as if they were obtained in an anechoic chamber.</p><p>Right now I'd say that FuzzMeasure is capable of producing some top-notch data. With a few more weeks of polish (if they're productive enough) this tool should be ready for human consumption.</p><p></p>